Friday, 22 August 2014

Ice Bucket Chellenge

OK, so unless you don't use the internet at all, ever, for anything, you'll have most definitely heard about the "ice bucket challenge".  I'm pretty sure that this is the year for doing stupid things to get more facebook likes - sorry I mean raise money for charity and be a little poppet....yeah....anyway...

I've been going around with my fingers in my ears about this one.  Ever since I first heard about it.  It started with some article featuring Mark Zuckerberg saying that he's 'nominated' Bill Gates for the Ice Bucket Challenge.  I saw it, and just kept scrolling.  I had no interest in it then, and even less interest in it now, the more and more I've thought about it.

Most people, on seeing my reaction of "I don't want to see that lalalalala" have been pretty disgusted and exclaim about my lack of empathy for ALS sufferers or that I just don't care about helping other people, which actually couldn't be further from the truth.  In actual fact, I'll go to extremes for a friend, relative, a little old lady down the road who needs a hand with something or other.  If someone asks me for help, I'll always do what I can.  That's my version of the 'ice bucket challenge'.  Actually doing things for other people and knowing that what I've done has made some kind of difference.  I don't get likes on facebook for it, and don't expect people to follow suit.  I know many wouldn't, which is really very sad.

Even sadder, is that many people who throw money at charities don't even know what happens to their money, maybe don't even care.  We saw that with the Chinese whispers style error in the no make-up selfie with money flying around to all kinds of other charities.  No one had a clue what they were doing.

But I digress.  The main charity used in these ice bucket challenge is the national ALS charity.  It's actually one of the charities that puts the most money towards its actual cause in America.  Sounds pretty good so far?  Well, no.  Actually no.  It's a national charity, so the local charities don't get any additional help, and they're the ones that give back to the local community.  The main national charity  does more of the research aspect, which whilst necessary doesn't go to any lengths to improve the lives of current sufferers or their families.  The other thing is the shocking figures for the national ALS charity's book balancing for 2012. This wasn't a special year or anything, just the most recent figures to be available and reliable.  Here's some figures I found for you.  Take a look for yourself.

  • Total Revenue: $19,690,252
  • Total Expenses: $19,796,581
  • Salaries and Wages: $4,328,559
  • CEO Pay: $297,288
  • Travel: $1,171,175
  • Professional Fundraiser Expenses: $709,621
In my cynical opinion, whether or not you agree with me, the best things about charities are the job creation that comes with them and the money that they put back into the community via non-charitable spending.  If that's what you want to support, then fine, but personally, I'll stick to helping little old Joyce down the road learn how to use a trackpad.  At least I know that's one more person in the world who will be able to Skype her relatives in Australia instead of feeling lonely on a Friday night.  I may not have spent any money on her, but I'll have given her my time, which to her is much more valuable and appreciated than any money.

Monday, 18 August 2014

Sweden shares it's twitter account with its people!

 I found you something cool on Twitter.

Sweden has a twitter account that it hands over to a different random Swedish citizen each week. It's then that person's job for the week to tell the world about Sweden from their own point of view. Very good idea.

You can go and check out the twitter account at https://twitter.com/sweden

Jess Glynne - Right here

I quite enjoy a wide range of music, but I've struggled since my 20s to really get into any newer dance or mainstream releases which don't involve bands.  I heard this song earlier in the year though and subsequently quite a bit recently, and I really quite like it.  I think it's got one of those 90's old school dance vibes behind it and that's fine by me.  My favourite era.  What do you think of this youtube video of the song that I found for you?



Sunday, 17 August 2014

Hippo swallows dwarf

Sometimes, you come across one of those posts where you have a really good giggle, then think "no, that can't be true" so you go and research it. Well I had one of those moments when I found this for you. I looked it up. It's not really real. It's more like one of those urban legends, but it's funny all the same. Have a read :)

The premeditated murder flowchart

Ever wanted to do some killin'?  I found a flowchart for you to help you sort that out.


Saturday, 16 August 2014

The arrogance of mankind

The guy's got a very valid point.  Think about it.

Banned commercial - funny parrot (NSFW)


If the world were 100 people

It's difficult to see the whole picture if you're thinking of the world to scale.  Millions of people going about their day to day lives.  Different religious beliefs, different languages, some privileged whilst others are not.  So I found this for you.  It's pretty interesting.  Imagine the word condensed into a little village of 100 people.  What would you have?



If the World were 100 PEOPLE:
50 would be female
50 would be male
20 would be children
There would be 80 adults,
14 of whom would be 65 and older

There would be:
61 Asians
12 Europeans
13 Africans
14 people from the Western Hemisphere
There would be:
31 Christians
21 Muslims
14 Hindus
6 Buddhists
12 people who practice other religions
16 people who would not be aligned with a religion
17 would speak a Chinese dialect
8 would speak Hindustani
8 would speak English
7 would speak Spanish
4 would speak Arabic
4 would speak Russian
52 would speak other languages

82 would be able to read and write; 18 would not
1 would have a college education
1 would own a computer
75 people would have some supply of food and a place to
shelter them from the wind and the rain, but 25 would not
1 would be dying of starvation
17 would be undernourished
15 would be overweight
83 would have access to safe drinking water
17 people would have no clean, safe water to drink